<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unintended Side Effects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simpleandloveable.com/unintended-side-effects/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simpleandloveable.com/unintended-side-effects</link>
	<description>How to make Simple and Loveable businesses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:19:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nat</title>
		<link>http://www.simpleandloveable.com/unintended-side-effects/comment-page-1#comment-2937</link>
		<dc:creator>Nat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 20:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simpleandloveable.com/unintended-side-effects#comment-2937</guid>
		<description>I think they probably do... I have only just started using it :) Feedback wars are interesting because if someone leaves feedback for you last and it&#039;s a blatant lie, you do feel the urge to reply!

Potentially there is room to &#039;rank&#039; feedbacks, and &#039;control&#039; the system a little bit. I think sometimes, as an idealist, I find it frustrating when we&#039;re left the tools to manage ourselves and end up abusing the system so need to bring in more control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they probably do&#8230; I have only just started using it :) Feedback wars are interesting because if someone leaves feedback for you last and it&#8217;s a blatant lie, you do feel the urge to reply!</p>
<p>Potentially there is room to &#8216;rank&#8217; feedbacks, and &#8216;control&#8217; the system a little bit. I think sometimes, as an idealist, I find it frustrating when we&#8217;re left the tools to manage ourselves and end up abusing the system so need to bring in more control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.simpleandloveable.com/unintended-side-effects/comment-page-1#comment-2932</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 12:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simpleandloveable.com/unintended-side-effects#comment-2932</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand, doesn&#039;t Trade Me have a &quot;Sale not Complete&quot; process to cover when a sale (for whatever reason) ??? Ebay and other foreign auction sites (like the Baazee.com &amp; Bidorbuy.com that I helped build) have a strict process to manage the end of sale process so that lax sellers or buyers don&#039;t get away with crappy service. 

To be honest, I&#039;m surprised sometime how Trade Me has made it to the top.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand, doesn&#8217;t Trade Me have a &#8220;Sale not Complete&#8221; process to cover when a sale (for whatever reason) ??? Ebay and other foreign auction sites (like the Baazee.com &amp; Bidorbuy.com that I helped build) have a strict process to manage the end of sale process so that lax sellers or buyers don&#8217;t get away with crappy service. </p>
<p>To be honest, I&#8217;m surprised sometime how Trade Me has made it to the top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bwooce</title>
		<link>http://www.simpleandloveable.com/unintended-side-effects/comment-page-1#comment-2930</link>
		<dc:creator>Bwooce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 07:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simpleandloveable.com/unintended-side-effects#comment-2930</guid>
		<description>This mirrors my experience, but wait until you do have a bad trade that stops short of outright theft/fraud. Placing bad feedback begets bad feedback, and either both sides mutually retract it (leaving noone the wiser) or you&#039;re left with a permanent bad record. Feedback wars used to eventuate before they limited the number of changes; I much prefer the eBay write-one approach.

It isn&#039;t until you get a hundred or so trades under your belt that you start looking more kindly on those people with *only* 96% good feedback after a thousand trades. There are screwballs everywhere.

Also there is no way of rating feedback against one another; I&#039;d imagine that 2 good feedbacks for buying/selling cars rate higher than 10 books by quite a measure. The removal of $ value and deletion of old auctions leaves buyers ignorant and I think that is a big error.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This mirrors my experience, but wait until you do have a bad trade that stops short of outright theft/fraud. Placing bad feedback begets bad feedback, and either both sides mutually retract it (leaving noone the wiser) or you&#8217;re left with a permanent bad record. Feedback wars used to eventuate before they limited the number of changes; I much prefer the eBay write-one approach.</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t until you get a hundred or so trades under your belt that you start looking more kindly on those people with *only* 96% good feedback after a thousand trades. There are screwballs everywhere.</p>
<p>Also there is no way of rating feedback against one another; I&#8217;d imagine that 2 good feedbacks for buying/selling cars rate higher than 10 books by quite a measure. The removal of $ value and deletion of old auctions leaves buyers ignorant and I think that is a big error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

